INDIANAPOLIS —Arguably, nothing could damage a franchisor’s reputation more than allegations it had duped franchisees with a bad concept, then took their money and ran. That’s probably so even considering complaints franchisees sometimes make about a brand owner’s tolerance for unrestricted encroachment, weak field support or unwise spending of marketing co-op dollars. Nonetheless, duped-and-disregarded allegations are ...
Register to view this article
It’s free but we need to know a little about you to continually improve our content.
Registering allows you to unlock a portion of our premium online content. You can access more in-depth stories and analysis, as well as news not found on any other website or any other media outlet. You also get free eNewsletters, blogs, real-time polls, archives and more.
Attention Print Subscribers: While you have already been granted free access to NRN we ask that you register now.We promise it will only take a few minutes!
Questions about your account or how to access content?