Sponsored By

California ‘Walmart loophole’ bill rejected by state AssemblyCalifornia ‘Walmart loophole’ bill rejected by state Assembly

Decision seen as ‘a victory for the restaurant industry — for now’

Lisa Jennings, Executive Editor

June 28, 2013

2 Min Read
Nation's Restaurant News logo in a gray background | Nation's Restaurant News

The California state Assembly rejected a bill Thursday that would penalize large employers if their workers ended up on state Medicare rolls.

Assembly Bill 880, proposed by Jimmy Gomez, D-Los Angeles, was rejected on a vote of 46 to 27, falling short of the 54 votes needed to continue.

Though the issue could come up again this year, bill watchers say that’s unlikely because it would need a two-thirds vote for passage, and Democrats will reportedly lose their majority after an Assembly member moves to the Los Angeles City Council next week.

RELATED
California bill seeks to prevent employers from cutting worker hours
Forty Hours is Full Time Act gains bipartisan support
More government news at NRN.com

AB-880 aimed to close the so-called “Walmart loophole,” the notion that employers will shift to part-time workers rather than pay the health care costs for those working 30 hours or more, as will be required under the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, or PPACA.

The bill would have required large employers to pay penalties for any employee — even those working as little as eight hours per week — who chose coverage under the state’s Medicaid program, or Medi-Cal. Additional penalties would come into play if large employers demoted, discharged or suspended workers who chose Medi-Cal.

The penalties would have gone toward alleviating the cost of the Medi-Cal program, which is expected to see a dramatic increase in participation once the Affordable Care Act is implemented next year.

Business groups widely opposed AB-880. The California Restaurant Association, the National Retail Federation and the National Council of Chain Restaurants were among those who argued that the legislation would have unfairly punished employers who planned to offer health care coverage under PPACA’s specifications.

Orlando, Fla.-based Darden Restaurants Inc. chief executive Clarence Otis was among those who visited Sacramento this year to oppose the legislation. Darden has roughly 16,000 employees in restaurants across California.

Matt Sutton, the California Restaurant Association’s vice president of government affairs and public policy, described the Assembly vote Thursday as “a victory for the restaurant industry — for now.”

Contact Lisa Jennings at [email protected].
Follow her on Twitter: @livetodineout

About the Author

Lisa Jennings

Executive Editor, Nation's Restaurant News and Restaurant Hospitality

Lisa Jennings is executive editor of Nation’s Restaurant News and Restaurant Hospitality. She joined the NRN staff as West Coast editor in 2004 as a veteran journalist. Before joining NRN, she spent 11 years at The Commercial Appeal, the daily newspaper in Memphis, Tenn., most recently as editor of the Food and Health & Wellness sections. Prior experience includes staff reporting for the Washington Business Journal and United Press International.

Lisa’s areas of expertise include coverage of both large public restaurant chains and small independents, the regulatory and legal landscapes impacting the industry overall, as well as helping operators find solutions to run their business better.

Lisa Jennings’ experience:

Executive editor, NRN (March 2020 to present)

Executive editor, Restaurant Hospitality (January 2018 to present)

Senior editor, NRN (September 2004 to March 2020)

Reporter/editor, The Commercial Appeal (1990-2001)

Reporter, Washington Business Journal (1985-1987)

Contact Lisa Jennings at:

[email protected]

@livetodineout

https://www.linkedin.com/in/lisa-jennings-83202510/

 

Subscribe Nation's Restaurant News Newsletters
Get the latest breaking news in the industry, analysis, research, recipes, consumer trends, the latest products and more.